The mythbusters are worth reading in their own right. They're also worthy of attention in commemoration of the late Ron Castan QC, a brilliant lawyer and a good man.
The current items are -
Myth 1: The proposed Human Rights Act would shift decision making to unelected judges
Myth 2: Judges would be able to effectively change the law under a Human Rights Act
Myth 3: Judges would use a Human Rights Act to bully politicians into changing laws to comply with human rights
Myth 4: Human rights are too political for judges
Myth 5: Human rights are too vague for judges
Myth 6: A Human Rights Act would be a lawyers' feast
Myth 7: Our human rights are adequately protected already
