The Committee's Terms of Reference were to
inquire into, consider and report on, no later than 22 August 2017, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Victoria (Inc) in relation to —
(1) the appropriateness and use of its powers pursuant to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986, including in the context of its other objectives and activities;
(2) the appropriateness and use of funding provided by the Victorian Government, including in the context of its other objectives and activities; and
The Chair’s foreword states that the Report(3) any other consequential matters the Committee may deem appropriate.
primarily looks at two issues: the use of its powers by the RSPCA Victoria; and its expenditure of government funding.
For the most part it appears that the objections raised by stakeholders in relation to RSPCA Victoria relate to the organisation’s historical practices.
For example the organisation has in the past been involved in animal rights activism, in some instances campaigning against activities that are legal in Victoria, such as duck shooting.
Some stakeholders suggested that RSPCA Victoria inspectors were involved in campaigns and action relating to commercial animals, overstepping their statutory function.
Since the Independent Review of the RSPCA Victoria Inspectorate in 2016 it has made good progress towards focusing on the prevention of cruelty to companion animals rather than engaging in animal rights activism.
The RSPCA Victoria now needs to focus on developing stronger stakeholder relationships. Many of the organisations the Committee engaged with believe that a more collegial approach to prevention of cruelty to animals would be of great benefit to the sector.
Both the government and the RSPCA Victoria should ensure greater transparency and provision of information about the role and powers of inspectors.The Committee's Findings and recommendations are
Finding 1: Many of the issues identified in the Inquiry evidence relate to historical issues associated with RSPCA Victoria animal rights activism. Progress has been made to address these issues as a result of the Independent Review of the RSPCA Victoria Inspectorate in 2016.
Legislative powers and responsibilities of RSPCA Victoria
Recommendation 1: That the Victorian Government and RSPCA Victoria provide more transparency, information and detail with regard to the powers of RSPCA Victoria inspectors under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986 and the Memorandum of Understanding between the RSPCA Victoria and the Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources. .
Recommendation 2: That RSPCA Victoria ensure that it investigates cruelty to commercial animals in emergency situations only, in line with Division 2 of Part 2A of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986
Ongoing concerns
Finding 2: Stakeholder issues with the level of activism in some campaigns run by the RSPCA Victoria are justified. However, there was some confusion from stakeholders, and a number of the concerns raised related to campaigns run by RSPCA bodies in other jurisdictions. .
Recommendation 3: That RSPCA Victoria in consultation with the Victorian Government consider ways to improve engagement and collaboration with animal stakeholder organisations. .
Finding 3: All government grant funding provided to RSPCA Victoria’s inspectorate is used, and is required to be used, for inspectorate purposes only.The report followed the 2016 independent review of the RSPCA Victoria inspectorate.by former Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Neil Comrie after rising cruelty reports, 'significant changes in the social landscape', and public concern about RSPCA Victoria’s capacity to deal with large scale serious cruelty incidents. The final Comrie report in September 2016 made two findings and 22 recommendations, including
• an internal assessment of RSCPA Victoria’s budgetary position, and if necessary preparing a budget submission to the Victorian Government for incremental increases
• improving the safety culture of the inspectorate
• staff management improvements
• an organisational restructure
• improvements to collaboration and cooperation
• improvements to the inspectorate, inc updated accommodation, reviewing equipment provided to inspectors, and better use of volunteers to assist with reports that are not the primary responsibility of the inspectorate
• Domestic Animals Act: – reduce workload on DAA, eventually having all DAA work done by councils
• actively pursuing court costs
• lobbying government for the ability to issue infringement noticesThe Comrie review made recommendations in four categories: operational management, collaboration, legislation and activism -
Finding 1: That the RSPCA Board has authorised the CEO to: a. commence the necessary processes to acquire a case management/intelligence software platform for the Inspectorate b. proceed with the necessary arrangements to secure the secondment of a Victoria Police intelligence analyst to the Inspectorate for a twelve ‑ month pilot period.
Finding 2: The RSPCA Board has authorised the CEO to take all steps necessary to secure the location of a specialist prosecutor within the Police Prosecutions Unit.
Recommendation 1: Following implementation of all recommendations in this Report, the RSPCA reassess their budgetary position and the demand for Inspectorate services at that time and if warranted, take the necessary steps to develop a budget submission to the Victorian Government for an incremental increase to their recurrent budget allocation.
Recommendation 2: That the RSPCA take all necessary action to improve the safety culture at the Inspectorate.
Recommendation 3: That the RSPCA implement measures to retain valuable staff in the Inspectorate, including establishing incremental salary levels that recognise experience and responsibility and also adopt more contemporary, flexible working arrangements such as part ‑ time employment and job sharing.
Recommendation 4: That the RSPCA consider all viable options for the efficient recruitment of Inspectors, including group assessments and the development of a priority list to be drawn upon when future vacancies occur.
Recommendation 5: That the People and Culture Department of the RSPCA in conjunction with the management of the Inspectorate, undertake a training needs analysis of the role of Inspector. A robust, skills based, accredited training program should then be developed to meet the specific needs of RSPCA Inspectors and successful completion of this program should be an obligatory component of the probationary period leading to authorisation of an Inspector under the POCTAA.
Recommendation 6: That, as far as possible, the RSPCA remove peripheral and corporate administrative functions from the Inspectorate to allow it to focus on operational responsibilities, especially supervision.
Recommendation 7: That supervisory responsibility and accountability be strengthened in the Inspectorate by the creation of new roles of Team Leader and Senior Inspector within a regional service delivery model.
Recommendation 8: That the RSPCA provide the necessary structure, support functions, training and development to ensure that the Inspectorate Manager, Team Leaders and Senior Inspectors provide strong leadership as well as meeting their management obligations.
Recommendation 9: That the RSPCA introduce a new structure and operating model.
Recommendation 10: That the RSPCA ensure that radio monitoring is the shared responsibility of Inspectorate administrative staff from 8am to 6pm each week day on a two ‑ hourly rotational basis
Recommendation 11: That the RSPCA review its existing memoranda of understanding, standard operating procedures and protocols with other organisations to ensure that these arrangements reflect the proposed operating environment of the Inspectorate, including the new approach to case management.
Recommendation 12: That the RSPCA take the action necessary to provide relevant policies, procedures and templates to Inspectors online.
Recommendation 13: That the RSPCA undertake a review of the accommodation arrangements for the Inspectorate and take the necessary steps to provide accommodation that meets the operational needs of that group under the proposed operating model.
Recommendation 14: That the RSPCA undertake an equipment needs analysis to ensure that the equipment issued to Inspectors enables them to undertake their duties more safely and efficiently.
Recommendation 15: That the RSPCA utilise specially selected and suitably trained and supported volunteers to assist with reports that are not the primary responsibility of the Inspectorate. This will involve direct contact with identified complainants to advise them of referrals or the actions taken by the RSPCA or to offer other advice, information or educational material. This may include seeking additional advice from complainants where critical information may be missing from relevant reports.
Recommendation 16: That the RSPCA: a. engage with Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR) to identify strategies to reduce the workload related to Domestic Animals Act 1994 matters that is currently, by default, being directed to the RSPCA; b. engage with local government to ensure that there is a clear understanding of the future focus for the Inspectorate on animal cruelty and that Domestic Animals Act 1994 matters directed to the Inspectorate will be referred to the relevant local government (and complainants advised accordingly); and c. develop and implement a communications strategy to better inform and educate the community that the future role of the Inspectorate is to be confined to prevention of cruelty to animals and that the Inspectorate will no longer respond to Domestic Animals Act 1994 reports.
Recommendation 17: That the RSPCA ensure that the prosecutor responsible for POCTAA prosecutions actively pursues the payment of court costs awarded to the RSPCA.
Recommendation 18: That the RSPCA actively pursue with the State Government the authority to issue infringement notices: a. for lower level offences that are not to the requisite level of seriousness to warrant criminal prosecution; and b. for failing to meet the requirements of Notices to Comply issued under Section 36G of POCTAA
Recommendation 19: That the RSPCA engage with the State Government to seek an amendment to the POCTAA to allow for the fostering out and/or transfer of ownership of seized animals held for extended periods pending the resolution of court proceedings.
Recommendation 20: That the RSPCA further explore with DEDJTR the viability of licensing the keeping of horses as an aid to better management of animal welfare and cruelty reports.
Recommendation 21: That RSPCA Victoria, while continuing its legitimate advocacy role, discontinue its public activist campaigning against the existing laws of this State.
Recommendation 22: To ensure that effective governance and accountability arrangements are in place regarding the implementation of the recommendations in this report, the RSPCA: a. ensure that one senior executive in the organisation is the accountable officer for the delivery of these recommendations; b. make that officer responsible for the preparation of the implementation plan for consideration of approval by the Board; c. task a Board committee to oversight regular reports on progress against the implementation plan; and d. publish progress on implementation of these recommendations in RSPCA annual reports for the next three years
