The Council comments that over thirty years have passed since the commencement of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), so that it is timely to examine federal judicial review and assess whether the existing system for judicial review of administrative decisions meets current needs.
Matters relevant to the ARC inquiry include -
• the divergence of legal principle between constitutional judicial review and judicial review under the ADJR ActThe paper indicates that the Council will consider -
• the differing jurisdiction of the three federal courts in judicial review matters
• the development of legal principle in all judicial review jurisdictions, including the alignment of state and federal judicial review
• the increase in both legislation and the volume of decisions made by government
• the privatisation of government functions through a variety of mechanisms
• changes in the way that decisions are made, in particular the use of technology to automate decision making, and
• the use of hybrid mechanisms which combine features of administrative decision making with decisions of a legislative character.
• developments in the law of both statutory and constitutional judicial reviewThe paper has five parts.
• changes in the broader system of government administration
• statistical data about judicial review applications under the current system
• comparisons with other jurisdictions, and
• views of stakeholders.
The first identifies the background to the inquiry, summarises past reports dealing with judicial review, and notes the ARC's aims regarding the future direction of judicial review, including -
• the need for statutory review mechanisms, both general and specific, in light of the fact that constitutional judicial review is entrenched and cannot be excluded by legislationThe second part describes the Australian administrative law system in Australia and its development, covering changes to government since the 1970s that justify reconsideration of the system and foundational administrative law principles. The third part deals with "the complex mechanics of the current system of judicial review — the constitutional sources of review, the ADJR Act and other statutory sources of review", including a statistical overview.
• the ambit and provisions of a general statutory review scheme, if the Council considers such a scheme to be desirable, and
• general principles that should to apply to any statutory review scheme, and guidance as to whether and when specific statutory review mechanisms are appropriate.
The fourth part identifies the key issues, with overlapping sources for judicial review potentially creating uncertainty for users of the system. It examines and makes recommendations regarding six elements of judicial review —
• the ambit or scope of judicial review - the range of decisions and decision makers that are subject to judicial review, and those that might be included under an expanded regimeThe paper also discusses 'additional statutory review mechanisms', ie the role of specific statutory review provisions operating in particular decision making jurisdictions and in appeals from Administrative Appeals Tribunal decisions. "These mechanisms add another layer to the multiple avenues of review, and their role could be reconsidered as part of the development of a new general statutory review scheme."
• the grounds of review - a comparison of the grounds available under the common law and statutory models and questions about the best approach to ensuring that there is clarity around the grounds of review
• remedies - a comparison of the remedies available under the common law and statutory models and whether any additional remedies are required.
• standing - the purpose and effect of standing requirements in judicial review proceedings and when a broader standing test should be available for judicial review
• reasons - should be an obligation to provide reasons for a decision and what that obligation should entail
• court procedures - the role of the courts in the judicial review process and whether the streamlining processes which have been introduced into migration litigation might be introduced more broadly
The final part of the paper considers models for implementing reforms to judicial review, comparing other jurisdictions and outlining possible models for reform in Australia.