12 June 2013

Gamete Donation

Past posts in this blog have highlighted Australian debate about deanonymisation of sperm donation and adoption.

'Can You Buy Sperm Donor Identification? An Experiment' (Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 12-36) by Travis G. Coan and I. Glenn Cohen argues that
 In the United States, most sperm donations are anonymous. By contrast, many developed nations require sperm donors to be identified, typically requiring new sperm (and egg) donors to put identifying information into a registry that is made available to a donor-conceived child once they reach the age of 18. Recently, advocates have pressed U.S. states to adopt these registries as well, and state legislatures have indicated openness to the idea. 
This study relies on a self-selected convenience sample to experimentally examine the economic implications of adopting a mandatory sperm donor identification regime in the U.S. Our results support the hypothesis that subjects in the treatment (non-anonymity) condition need to be paid significantly more, on average, to donate their sperm. We find that individuals in the control condition are willing-to-accept an average of $83.78 to donate, while individuals in the treatment group are willing-to-accept an average of $124.21. These estimates suggest that it would cost roughly $40 per sperm donor per donation, at least in our sample, to require donors to be identified.