includes data from 1,011 prison entrants, 437 prison dischargees, over 9,500 prisoners who visited a prison health clinic and about 9,400 prisoners who took medications. These data were provided by prisons in all states and territories in Australia except New South Wales, which provided data on prison entrants only. Participation was not complete - 84% of prisons participated, with about 49% of prison entrants and 42% of sentenced dischargees in those prisons taking part. Accordingly, the information in this report needs to be interpreted with some caution.The AIHW indicates that the 224 page report [PDF]
includes, for the first time, data on the smoke-free status of prisons, disabilities and long-term health conditions experienced by prisoners, and self-assessed health status. Mental health issues and risky health behaviours, including tobacco smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and illicit use of drugs, continue to be the main areas of concern. The health of Indigenous prisoners (over-represented at 27% of the prison population) is also a continuing concern.
Prisoners in Australia continue to have high smoking rates compared with the general population. Almost three-quarters (74%) of prison entrants were current smokers, with 69% of entrants indicating they smoked daily. One-half (50%) of entrants who smoked on entry to prison reported that they would like to quit. Smoking bans are in varying stages of implementation in Australian prisons. Almost three-quarters (74%) of prison dischargees in prisons allowing smoking currently smoked, with one-in-six (16%) indicating that they smoked more now than they did on entry to prison. Dischargees from prisons with smoking bans were more likely to use quit smoking assistance in prison. Of those who smoked on entry to prison, dischargees from prisons with smoking bans were less likely to intend to smoke after release (59%) than those from prisons in which smoking is allowed (73%).
Almost one-third (30%) of entrants reported a long-term health condition or disability that limited their daily activities and/or affected their participation in education or employment. Limitations to daily activities were the most common (24%), followed by restrictions in employment (16%) and education (12%). About 2% of prison entrants needed help and/or supervision in the areas of self-care, mobility and/or communication. Entrants aged between 35 and 54 years were more likely to have some form of limitation or restriction than their general community counterparts.
Self-assessed physical and mental health
Prisoners being discharged from prison were more likely than those entering prison to report their mental health as generally good or better (78% compared with 67% respectively) and less likely to report it as poor (4% compared with 8%). A similar pattern was seen in self-reported physical health, with dischargees slightly more likely to report their physical health as generally good or better than entrants (78% compared with 73%).It notes
Prisoners have higher levels of mental health problems, risky alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, illicit drug use, chronic disease and communicable diseases than the general population (AIHW 2013a). This means that prisoners have significant and complex health needs, which are often long-term or chronic in nature. The health of prisoners is sufficiently poorer than in the general community such that prisoners are often considered to be geriatric at the age of 50–55 (Williams et al. 2014).
The United Nations Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice on 22 May 2015 adopted updated standard minimum rules on the treatment of prisoners, to be known as the ‘Mandela Rules’. This update to the original 1955 rules details the provision of health care to prisoners, and includes principles of equivalence (to the community standard); independence; multidisciplinary care including psychological and psychiatric, and dental; and continuity of care back to the community upon release from prison (United Nations 2015). These rules, launched by the General Assembly of the UN in October 2015, are reflected in the Australian context. The Corrective Services Administrators’ 2012 Standard Guidelines for Corrections in Australia specifically reference health care provision in prisons, including equivalence of care, access to both primary and specialist health professionals, medical examination within 24 hours of being received into prison, continuity of care between the community and prison, care for pregnant female prisoners, mental health and disability (AIC 2012).
Prison stays are usually temporary. On 30 June 2014, about one-quarter (24%) of prisoners were on remand while awaiting trial or sentencing. For those who were sentenced, the median time expected to serve was 1.8 years (ABS 2014e). As a result, the prison population is fluid, with prisoners constantly entering prison and being released from prison, and the health issues and concerns of prisoners therefore become those of the general community.
Prisoner health services in Australia
In Australia there are several differences in the way health services are provided to prisoners compared with the general community, including funding arrangements and models of service delivery.
In the general community, health services are provided through both the Australian Government and the relevant state or territory government. However, health services for prisoners are the responsibility of state and territory governments only, and the manner in which these services are delivered varies among jurisdictions.
In some states and territories the local Department of Health provides health services in prisons, while in others it is the responsibility of the Department of Justice or Corrections. Most jurisdictions use a mix of directly-provided services, community health services and contracted health services. The provision of mental health services and alcohol and other drug services can be particularly complex, both in the services delivered and the method of delivery. In prisons, primary health care, or the first level of contact with the health care system, is predominantly delivered by nurses. In the general community, however, most primary care is provided by general practitioners.
Specialist medical care can be provided to prisoners within the prison system or through non-prison-based services—such as general hospital inpatient and emergency care— depending on the prison, jurisdiction and service required. For example, some prison clinics have the capacity to deliver dental services and perform X-rays, whereas other smaller clinics are staffed by a single nurse only.
Medicare enables residents of Australia to have access to free or subsidised health care by health professionals such as doctors and nurses, including free treatment and accommodation in public hospitals. Medicare is funded by the Australian Government and does not apply to services provided directly by state and territory governments. This means that prisoner health services are effectively excluded from Medicare. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), which enables access to medicines at lower cost for Australian residents, is also funded by the Australian Government. Prisoners are therefore excluded from the PBS as well, except for Schedule 100 of the PBS, known as the Highly Specialised Drugs Program.
Healthcare in the prison environment
For prisoners who may underuse health services in the general community, prison may provide an opportunity to access treatment to improve their health. Many types of health care are accessed less often in the community than in prison (see section 15.1) for a variety of reasons, including cost, work or family commitments, and alcohol and drug issues (see section 15.2). The stability and regimentation of the prison environment may provide opportunities for prisoners to reflect on and seek treatment for their health concerns. However, the provision and operation of health services in a prison environment is not always straightforward. For example:
▪ Regimes and processes in place in a prison environment may make the goal of equivalence and continuity of care between the community and prison difficult to achieve, especially upon entry.
▪ Delays in being able to establish communication with a prisoner’s community-based general practitioner or psychiatrist, or to confirm existing prescriptions, may in turn lead to disruptions to regular medications or changes to established medication practices. Such issues may leave prisoners at increased risk of mental instability at the particularly difficult time of transition into prison (Bowen et al. 2009).
▪ Uncertainty surrounding exact discharge dates, which can be affected by, for example, applications for bail and parole, increases the difficulties associated with continuity of care into the community following release.
Tobacco smoking is a significant health issue in the prison environment, with around 75% of prisoners entering as current smokers in 2015, and prison being a particularly difficult environment in which to successfully quit (AIHW 2013b). Smoking is banned in all enclosed public places and most outdoor public areas in Australia, and bans are increasingly being introduced to prisons (see Chapter 11 ‘Tobacco smoking’).
The prison population in Australia is increasing both in overall numbers and in the rate of imprisonment (see section 2.1 ‘Australia’s prisoners’), and many prisons are at or over capacity. Prisons in Australia were operating during 2013-14 at 104.4% of design capacity, meaning that there were more prisoners than the prisons were designed to accommodate (excludes Victoria and South Australia, who did not provide data) (Productivity Commission 2015). One of the strategies used to manage this over-capacity is an increase in movements of prisoners between prisons, making continuing health service provision more difficult (Grace et al. 2013) .... A population-based linkage study in Australia of adults in their 20s and 30s found that around one-third (32%) of those with a psychiatric illness had been arrested during a 10-year period, and the first arrest often occurred before first contact with mental health services (Morgan et al. 2013).
Prisoners have a high prevalence of self-reported mental health issues (AIHW 2013a), which continue to affect prisoners after release. Prisoners ever-diagnosed with a mental health disorder have been found to be more likely to experience substance use issues, crime, and poor health outcomes, up to six months post-release from prison (Cutcher et al. 2014). Self-reported information on mental health is quite different to a clinical diagnosis or research using diagnostic tools. For example, in a culturally sensitive research study involving Indigenous respondents, a higher prevalence of mental health issues could be found by using Indigenous mental health clinicians specially trained for the data collection (see Heffernan et al. 2012).
Prison entrants were asked whether they had ever been told that they had a mental health disorder by a doctor, psychiatrist, psychologist or nurse; and whether they were currently taking medication for a mental health disorder. Disorders included those relating to drug and alcohol abuse. A nurse was included in this list of health professionals in recognition of the high proportion of entrants with a history of imprisonment, and the nurse-led health care provided in prisons, including mental health nurses (see Chapter 15 ‘General health services’). Prison dischargees were also asked whether they had ever been told they had a mental health disorder and whether it was diagnosed while they were in prison this time. Prison dischargees were also asked a separate question about whether they had ever been told that they had alcohol or drug use problems. To make the data comparable with data from the entrants’ question, responses to these two questions were combined to create one variable that indicated whether the dischargee had been diagnosed with both or either of these problems.
Almost one-half (49%) of entrants and 44% of dischargees reported ever having been told they have a mental health disorder, including alcohol and drug misuse (Table 4.1). This is an increase from 38% of entrants in 2012. In 2015, among both entrants and dischargees, women (62% and 63% respectively) were more likely than men (40% and 47%) to report a history of mental health issues. There were fluctuations by age, although the youngest were the least likely to report a history, for both entrants (40%) and dischargees (30%). Fewer Indigenous (44%) than non-Indigenous (51%) entrants reported a history, but among dischargees the difference was less apparent. ....
In the current data collection, 41% of dischargees thought that their mental health had improved since being in prison, with 19% reporting that it is ‘a lot better’ and 22% ‘a little better’. Less than 10% (9%) of dischargees thought their mental health had deteriorated while in prison, and 44% reported no change. Male dischargees were less positive than women, with 10% of men reporting that their mental health had become a little or a lot worse since being in prison, compared with 4% of women. Almost half (45–47%) of dischargees aged 25–44 reported an improvement in their mental health, compared with around one-third (30–33%) of the youngest and oldest dischargees. Indigenous dischargees were more positive than non-Indigenous dischargees in their responses. Just over one-half (51%) of Indigenous dischargees reported that their mental health was either a lot better (22%) or a little better (29%), compared with a combined 38% for non-Indigenous dischargees. Almost one-half (46%) of non-Indigenous dischargees reported no change in their mental health and wellbeing compared with 35% of Indigenous dischargees.