In considering declaration that a litigant is vexatious, noted in the preceding post, it is worth noting one of the documents quoted by the NSW Supreme Court in
Attorney General of New South Wales v Rahman [2014] NSWSC 42 -
As
mentioned in the above submissions the nature of whole spectrum of NSW
Judiciary and its Officials [ except few] are in continuous practices of
violations and transgress of the substantive enactments against the
Ethnic citizens for favour to their social'GENOMES' -the Officials of
the Government Department . They are acting as lawmaker and make laws of
their whim of minds whatever He /SHE [McCallum J, P.Garling, Johson ,
Facferling and others and Registrar Bradford C. Deputy Registrar James
Howard ] thinks for the validly for the Officials who are the
perpetrators violated and acted Crimes against Humanity -are same by the
Federal Court -Judicature and its Officials-Judges and Registrars...
Under
the above submission it is evident that the NSW Judicature has
transformed into a ' Institutional mafia' 29 and its employed judicial
members (except few- Hon. David Kirby J , NSW, & Hon. Schinder
J, Brisbane) as' judicial mafias' 30 and doing a continuous practices of
'crimes against humanity' as practised with the Applicant as well as
other social class, ethnic and racial group against the unlawful and
transgress decisions by the Officials , Government Departments , (Both
States and Commonwealth) as did with the Aborigines whom took away from
those classes the property, children and other belongs in favour of them
in the name of justice (Document enclosed).
A
continuum of crimes by Australian Judicature members -both States and
Commonwealth ( except few) - are continuous in CRIMES practice against
the humanity whom the applicant are not their lineage and brought
proceedings under statutory rights violations by the Executives , and
the Government Officials of the States and Commonwealth . And in such
scenario to deal and turn away from justice 'the rule of law as the
constitutions prescribes under statutes the 'Judicial mafia's such
crimes in the name verdict -a practice that has given birth to a
'neo-'Jus Cogens'' a law 'Dismissed with costs' (unconstitutional
compelling law by the Australia's' Judicial mafias) by abusing both
Nations States Domestic law and International treaty laws.
As
a Democratic Nation States Australia and the Judicature - High Court of
Australia are the' guardians of the 'fundamental Universals Human
rights and the issues under 'Constitutional provisions of Writs s69
Writs ' Supreme Court 1970 [NSW] and under s75(v) : of certiorari,
mandamus , habeas corpus. Injunctions , prohibitions , 'Commonwealth of
Australian Constitution Act ' 1900 Civil court , and impartial treatment
of ethnic and racial group and even international agreements that are
designed to protect human rights under the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), one of the main international human
rights treaties, and as such has failed to protect its citizens and
exposed to in great vulnerable of danger for such -penalisation - as per
se / pro se 'Unrepresented Applicant 'Dismissed ' and Dismissed with
costs' when violations has occurred by the judicial mafias. In 1990
Australia acceded to the First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, which
allows individuals to take complaints about violations of their human
rights to the UN Human Rights Committee against the perpetrators-
responsible for commit crimes as mentioned.
The
Applicant made submission on 25 May 2011 to Hon. Spigelman, Ex-Chief
Justices, Attorney-General Greg , Governor, NSW to address of such
Offences each of which is called a crime under s8 (1) (a) (b) (c) ICCA
Act 1988, S31 ,s32 & s34 Crimes Act 1914 and Division 268 .1 (1)
(2) (3) and 268.2 (2) and (4) Criminal Code Act (Clth) 1995 and
International Criminal Court Act -2002 'Crime against humanity and crime
against the administration of the justice of the International Criminal
Court' for the abuse of covenant of Human rights against the Judicial
officers under s3 Judicial Officers Act 1986 (NSW): as mentioned above ,
and the Registrar Bradford in the 'Civil Claim' Administrative Law,
under statutory right s69 -Writs- Supreme court for the above violations
as well as 'Neo-holocaust ( non white lineages) 'of all the applicable
statutory enactments of NSW and Commonwealth Legislations of the
proceedings above 'constitute fundamental breach of the principles of
Rule of law'- The natural justice that has been violated by those
Officer that has given birth - injustice , crimes under acts mentioned
and judicial bias -judicial racism' by the judicial mafias of Supreme
Court of NSW must be restrict, restrained and restraining order be made
for the applicant and other citizens - (for all Ethnic Australians)
under Internal Criminal Court Act ( Ratified as Nation State )for the
true administration of justice under International standard order be
made and therefore for its relief accordingly.
As
it is evident all the above decision by the those 'Quorum of Judges' '
JUDGE in the High Court and Supreme Court ' are of the violation and
breach of 'procedural fairness and rules of law the Supreme Court of NSW
as well as High Court of Australia as it is established that those
Judicial mafias has hijacked the Justices and engaged in taking the life
, wealth and property of the Ethnic Australian whom sought justice for
the cause of unlawful acts by those white lineage but in the name of
justice take away property, from them , incarceration for default of
payment , or any other hardships and render into homeless , property
less ,breaking of families and children , other social norms of customs
and bereft them from happy life but enormous tragedy living in a country
whom - Government declares for Australia 's Democratic ethics by
ratified the International Treaties for human dignities but Judicial
members [ except few] are in continuous practices of 'Crimes against
humanity; as they did by the Nazi to its Jews - Holocaust .
Likewise
Australia is in constant practice of 'Neo -Holocaust against its Ethnic
Australian ' [' when there no law as like the s 127 [ Aborigines not to
be counted as citizens) and Aborigines - (Stolen Generations- by the
Judges , Supreme Courts [States] and High Court of Australia ,
Commonwealth Government in disguise through its Judicature members(s) [
whom employment are racial and without transparency but political
motives] since long time Specially Supreme Court and High Court engaged
by such crimes against the domestic law and International Human rights
covenants and other International law by breaching and transgress as a
neo-holocaust and it must be arrested without impunity and thereby
relief for the victim -Ethnic Australian by the International Criminal
Court under statutes.
The Court in
Rahman referred to the following-
Dubs v Rahman [2012] FMCA 664
Rahman v Ashpole [2007] FCA 883
Rahman v Ashpole [2007] FCA 1067
Rahman v Bimson [2010] NSWSC 338
Rahman v Dayeh [2007] FMCA 98
Rahman v Dayeh and Ors (No 2) [2007] FMCA 234
Rahman v Dayeh [2007] FCA 786
Rahman v Dayeh & Ord [2008] HCASL 23
Rahman v Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCA 239
Rahman v Director-General Department Of Education & Training [2005] NSWCA 285
Rahman v Director-General NSW of Education & Training [2004] NSWIRComm 1036
Rahman v Director-General NSW of Education and Training in the State of NSW [2004] NSWIRComm 303
Rahman v Director-General NSW Department of Education and Training [2004] NSWIRComm 370
Rahman v Director-General Department of Education and Training [2005] NSWCA 158
Rahman v Director-General of Dept of Education and Training [2006] HCATrans 188
Rahman v Dubs (Supreme Court (NSW), McCallum J, 18 December 2009, unrep)
Rahman v Dubs [2010] NSWCA 129
Rahman v Dubs (Supreme Court (NSW), Hidden J, 1 February 2011, unrep)
Rahman v Dubs [2011] NSWSC 376
Rahman v Dubs [2012] NSWCA 98
Rahman v Dubs [2012] NSWSC 1065
Rahman v Dubs [2012] FCA 849
Rahman v Dubs (No 2) [2012] FCA 1081
Rahman v Dubs [2013] HCASL 23
Rahman v Eagle (District Court (NSW), Neilsen DCJ, 2 December 2011, unrep)
Rahman v Edward T David [2005] NSW 1251
Rahman v Hooper (District Court (NSW), Judicial Registrar Smith, 17 January 2012, unrep)
Rahman v Institute of Languages New South Global Pty Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Hulme J, 28 November 2005, unrep)
Rahman v Institute of Languages, New South Wales Global Pty Limited (Court of Appeal (NSW), Ipp JA, 6 February 2006, unrep)
Rahman v Institute of Languages New South Global Pty Limited [2007] HCA Trans 174
Rahman v John Robert Marsden trading as Marsdens Law Group & Ors [2005] NSWSC 1306
Rahman v Marsdens Law Group [2005] NSWSC 529
Rahman v New South Global Ltd (Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW), Innes G - Judicial Member, 7 November 2003, unrep)
Rahman v New South Global Ltd (EOD) [2003] NSWADTAP 46
Rahman v New South Global Pty Ltd [2004] NSWADTAP 49
Rahman v New South Global Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 1249
Rahman v New South Global Pty Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Giles and Bryson JJA, 3 August 2006, unrep)
Rahman v Riordan (Supreme Court (NSW), 15 April 2010, McCallum J, unrep)
Rahman v Riordan [2010] NSWCA 288
Rahman v Riordan [2010] NSWCA 375
Rahman v Riordan & Anor [2011] HCASL 16
Rahman v Riordan [2011] NSWCA 54
Rahman v Riordan [2011] NSWCA 142
Rahman v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2006] AATA 960
Rahman v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCA 1013
Rahman v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCAFC 187
Rahman v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2008] FCA 1634
Rahman v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2008] HCASL 401
Rahman v Sharpe (District Court (NSW), Delaney DCJ, 13 February 2012, unrep)
Rahman v Sharpe (No 1) [2012] NSWDC 48
Rahman v Sharpe (No 2) [2012] NSWDC 49
